Where as others would see us as endorsers of what is interpreted as child porn. I'm not so into photography as an art-form. Psychologists would say this points to something in his nature. His photos are sometimes very nice,and his mass photoshoots are wonderful public events that the World could use more of,but the resulting images are NOT fine art by any measure. No, we do not intend to let them bully us. You have to admit that the topic of child nudity is a very controversial and heated issue. SO,he simply discovers and presents what others don't dare to,for reasons that border on paranoia.
Peter, no offense taken and it was my fault for only mentioning half the story. For that, I apoligize in advance to the artist who made the photo I don't want to mention his name. The refusal to "compromise" appears to be less about artistic integrity and more about petulance. For a rule like the "no child nudes" rule, which in its current form is quite objective and specific, judgement is still required in determining the ages or in whether the photographer should be queried concerning the ages. Jock Sturges back on the site? Lannie, It seems like in a post under Jock's portfolio that you referred to his work as "unlawful", but I don't see it now so perhaps I am mistaken.
Settings My favourite lots My auction alerts. Heleen-Nijmegen February 17, Are you familiar with Sturges's books? Kosten meer dan waard. That does not suggest that the girls are troubled, or that you or I have some prurient interest in the images.